Study finds widespread H5N1 infection in black vultures

Bottom line

University of Georgia researchers report that highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) is hitting black vultures far harder than many clinicians and wildlife professionals may have assumed. In a Scientific Reports study published January 23, 2026, the team found H5N1 in 113 of 134 dead black vultures collected across seven southeastern states in 2022 and 2023, with evidence suggesting the birds’ scavenging behavior, including feeding on infected carcasses and sometimes on dead conspecifics, may help sustain transmission outside the usual waterfowl-driven season. UGA said more than 84% of the dead vultures tested positive, and the researchers warned the true toll could be far higher than documented submissions suggest. (nature.com)

Why it matters: For veterinary professionals, the findings widen the practical map of H5N1 risk. Black vultures aren’t just incidental spillover cases; they may act as efficient amplifiers within scavenger populations, which has implications for wildlife rehabilitation, diagnostic suspicion in neurologic or moribund raptors and scavengers, carcass handling, zoo and field biosecurity, and communication with farm clients and pet parents who encounter sick or dead birds. CDC says the public health risk remains low, but people with close, unprotected exposure to infected birds or other animals are at higher risk, reinforcing the need for PPE and reporting protocols. (nature.com)

What to watch: Continued surveillance in vultures, seasonal trend data, and whether agencies treat scavenging species as a larger part of H5N1 monitoring and response planning will be key. (nature.com)

Key facts

Topic
Highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) in black vultures
Study
Scientific Reports paper by University of Georgia researchers
Publication date
2026-01-23
Sample size
134 dead black vultures
Positive tests
113 vultures, or 84.3%
Geography
Seven southeastern states
Key finding
Scavenging, including feeding on infected carcasses and dead conspecifics, may help sustain transmission
Clinical signs and lesions
Most infected vultures were found dead or died shortly after discovery; common lesions included enlarged, mottled spleens and livers with severe necrosis
Public health note
CDC says the public health risk remains low, but close, unprotected exposure to infected birds or other animals raises risk

Bird flu appears to be far more entrenched in black vultures than many wildlife and veterinary observers expected. A new Scientific Reports paper from University of Georgia investigators found highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) in 113 of 134 dead black vultures examined from 2022 to 2023, or 84.3%, across seven southeastern states. The authors conclude that year-round mortality in 2022 may have been maintained by conspecific scavenging, raising concern that black vultures can sustain transmission beyond the classic migratory waterfowl window. (nature.com)

That fits into a broader shift in how H5N1 is behaving in wild birds. Johanna Harvey’s new Wildlife Monographs analysis argues that circulating highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses now show an expanded susceptible host range and higher transmission rates, with migration, host demographics, and species interactions shaping spread in ways that matter for both conservation and public health. Harvey’s review describes the current wave as affecting hundreds of avian species and argues that the dominant strain has an elevated ability to infect hosts, helping explain why species outside the traditional waterfowl focus are drawing more attention. (uri.edu)

The black vulture paper adds unusually detailed pathology and field observations to that bigger picture. The study documented 55 distinct mortality events, with many reports involving clusters of dozens of birds and some events exceeding 100 affected vultures. Most infected vultures were found dead or died shortly after discovery, and common lesions included enlarged, mottled spleens and livers with severe necrosis. The authors said the digestive tract findings, together with field observations, support ingestion of high viral doses as an important route of infection, which makes ecological sense in a species that feeds communally on carrion, uses dense roosts, and readily exploits landfills and other human-modified environments. (nature.com)

University of Georgia’s public summary put the scale in more concrete terms for a broader audience: the sampled birds may represent “tens or hundreds of thousands of black vultures,” according to lead author Dr. Nicole Nemeth, although that estimate is an extrapolation rather than a direct census count. UGA also highlighted a possible silver lining from earlier work: about half of infected vultures may survive, and some survivors had antibodies, suggesting at least partial population-level resilience even as transmission remains intense. (news.uga.edu)

Researchers also stressed that the concern isn’t limited to one scavenger species. Nemeth said sustained transmission creates more opportunities for viral change, while co-author Rebecca Poulson noted the diversity of avian influenza viruses still circulating and mixing in wildlife. That doesn’t mean vultures are currently driving a new human threat; CDC continues to assess the current risk to the general public as low. But CDC also says people usually become infected after close, unprotected exposure to infected birds or other animals, which keeps veterinarians, wildlife staff, rehabilitators, and others handling carcasses or sick birds in a higher-risk category than the general public. (news.uga.edu)

Why it matters: For veterinary professionals, this study is a reminder that H5N1 surveillance and clinical awareness can’t stay centered only on waterfowl and poultry. Black vultures may be functioning as a visible indicator of wider environmental circulation and as a self-perpetuating transmission node among scavengers. That has implications for differential diagnoses in wildlife cases, necropsy precautions, clinic and rehab intake protocols, communication with livestock clients about carcass management and wildlife contact, and conversations with pet parents who may find dead birds on their property. It also underscores the One Health overlap between wildlife disease ecology, poultry protection, livestock biosecurity, and occupational exposure. APHIS continues to maintain national wild bird detection reporting and surveillance planning, reflecting how central wildlife monitoring has become to the U.S. response. (nature.com)

What to watch: The next questions are whether ongoing surveillance shows persistent off-season circulation in vultures, whether similar patterns emerge in other obligate or near-obligate scavengers, and whether population impacts become measurable over time. The paper’s authors called for continued monitoring of black vultures to assess ecological effects, and the broader host-dynamics work suggests wildlife agencies may need to keep widening the list of species that matter for forecasting H5N1 spread. (nature.com)

How this developed

  1. Researchers collected dead black vultures for H5N1 testing.

  2. Researchers continued collecting dead black vultures for H5N1 testing.

  3. The Scientific Reports study was published.

Common questions

  • How many black vultures tested positive for H5N1?
    113 of 134 dead black vultures tested positive, or 84.3%.
  • Where were the affected vultures found?
    They were collected across seven southeastern states.
  • How might the virus be spreading in vultures?
    The researchers said scavenging, including feeding on infected carcasses and dead conspecifics, may help sustain transmission.
  • What should pet parents do if they find sick or dead birds?
    The article says people with close, unprotected exposure to infected birds or other animals are at higher risk, so PPE and reporting protocols are important.

Like what you're reading?

The Feed delivers veterinary news every weekday.