H5 bird flu reaches South Australia after first WA detection
Bottom line
Australia has confirmed H5 bird flu in a second state, with South Australia reporting its first case on June 24 in a southern giant petrel found on the Fleurieu Peninsula, days after Western Australia confirmed the country’s first detection in a brown skua from Cape Le Grand near Esperance. South Australian officials said the petrel was found on June 14, sampled after a wildlife care report, and confirmed positive by CSIRO’s Australian Centre for Disease Preparedness. Western Australia had already confirmed H5 in a wild seabird and noted a second positive wild bird under strain testing. Authorities in both states say there are still no detections in poultry, and South Australia is treating the event as an isolated wild-bird incident for now. (wa.gov.au)
Why it matters: For veterinarians, this shifts H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b from a preparedness scenario to an active surveillance and biosecurity issue in Australia. The virus has spread widely through wild birds and mammals globally, including sub-Antarctic territories such as Heard Island, and international agencies have warned that clade 2.3.4.4b continues to generate large numbers of wild-bird detections and spillover events in mammals. That raises the stakes for poultry practices, wildlife clinicians, emergency disease reporting, and client guidance for backyard flocks, pet birds, and exposure to sick or dead wildlife. (woah.org)
What to watch: Watch for confirmatory testing on additional wild birds, any spread beyond isolated seabird detections, and whether surveillance finds the first Australian poultry involvement. (wa.gov.au)
Key facts
- Country
- Australia
- Second state to confirm H5
- South Australia
- First South Australia case
- Southern giant petrel
- South Australia location
- Fleurieu Peninsula
- First Australia detection
- Brown skua
- Western Australia location
- Cape Le Grand near Esperance
- Confirmed by
- CSIRO’s Australian Centre for Disease Preparedness
- Poultry detections
- None reported in either state
- South Australia date announced
- 2026-06-24
Australia’s H5 bird flu response has expanded again, with South Australia becoming the second state to confirm the virus in wild birds just days after Western Australia recorded the nation’s first detection. South Australia said on June 24 that a southern giant petrel from the Fleurieu Peninsula tested positive, while Western Australia had already confirmed H5 in a brown skua from Cape Le Grand and reported another positive wild seabird still undergoing strain confirmation. Officials in both states continue to emphasize that no poultry infections have been detected. (wa.gov.au)
The development marks a notable change for Australia, which had remained free of this globally circulating H5 lineage even as clade 2.3.4.4b spread through wild birds, poultry, and multiple mammalian species across Europe, the Americas, Africa, Asia, and the sub-Antarctic. A joint FAO-WOAH-WHO assessment published in May said the virus had continued to circulate extensively in wild and domestic birds, with repeated spillovers into marine mammals, terrestrial mammals, and companion animals in some regions. Australia’s first confirmed case, announced June 20, involved a brown skua found sick on June 14 on Western Australia’s south coast. (woah.org)
South Australia’s case adds geographic spread, but not yet evidence of establishment in poultry or farm systems. PIRSA said the infected bird was a vagrant migratory seabird found debilitated on June 14 and taken into care, with samples collected after officials learned of the case through social media. The state said 774 bird samples had already been tested in 2026 and that two seabirds from Fowlers Bay on the Eyre Peninsula were negative. Western Australia’s first announcement likewise stressed that there were no poultry detections and no evidence of broader mortality at the time of confirmation. (pir.sa.gov.au)
The official framing has been consistent: this is a wildlife detection with significant agricultural implications, but not yet an agricultural outbreak. Federal and state agencies have directed the public and animal professionals to report sick or dead birds and avoid handling carcasses, while preparedness messaging has intensified around separation of domestic birds from wild birds, feed and water protection, and rapid reporting through the Emergency Animal Disease Hotline. The national bird flu campaign page and state advisories now position H5 as an active response issue rather than a hypothetical incursion. (agriculture.gov.au)
Industry and professional groups are already responding. The Australian Veterinary Association said it is monitoring the situation closely, remains engaged with relevant departments, and has pointed members to its HPAI preparedness toolkit, policy resources, and client education materials. Public health agencies have also tried to calibrate concern: WA Health said the detection does not pose a risk to the broader community, and the Australian Centre for Disease Control described the public health risk as low, while still reinforcing avoidance of sick or dead birds and the value of seasonal flu vaccination to reduce co-infection risk. (ava.com.au)
Why it matters: For veterinary professionals, the practical significance is less about immediate companion-animal caseload and more about surveillance, triage, and communication. Poultry veterinarians may see tighter on-farm biosecurity, heightened suspicion around drops in production or unexplained mortality, and more pressure to support outbreak planning. Wildlife and mixed-animal clinicians may need clearer protocols for PPE, carcass handling, referral, and reporting, especially if native seabirds, scavengers, or marine mammals begin presenting more often. Small flock and aviary clients will likely need direct advice on keeping domestic birds away from wild birds, securing feed and water, and reporting concerning signs quickly. (pir.sa.gov.au)
There’s also a broader ecological concern. Western Australia said the initial strain was consistent with virus detected in the Southern Indian Ocean Sub-Antarctic Territories, including Heard Island, and global assessments have documented ongoing H5N1 activity in sub-Antarctic birds and mammals through 2025 and 2026. That matters in Australia because the first detections are in migratory or vagrant seabirds, which fits long-standing expectations that wild bird movement would be the most likely route of entry. For veterinarians working with wildlife hospitals, zoos, sanctuaries, and coastal rehabilitation networks, the next phase may depend on whether detections remain sporadic or begin to cluster. (wa.gov.au)
What to watch: The next key signals are confirmatory results from additional suspect birds, any evidence of local transmission or mortality clusters, updated genomic data linking Australian detections to sub-Antarctic or other lineages, and, most importantly, whether the virus stays confined to wild seabirds or crosses into poultry operations. (wa.gov.au)
How this developed
-
Western Australia’s first brown skua case was found sick on the south coast, and South Australia’s infected petrel was found and sampled after a wildlife care report.
-
Western Australia announced Australia’s first H5 detection in a brown skua.
-
South Australia confirmed H5 in a southern giant petrel.
Common questions
Which birds tested positive?
A southern giant petrel in South Australia and a brown skua in Western Australia.Are poultry affected?
No poultry infections have been detected in either state.What should pet parents do?
Avoid handling sick or dead birds, and report them through the Emergency Animal Disease Hotline.Is this considered a wider outbreak?
Officials are treating South Australia’s case as an isolated wild-bird incident for now.