Northern Italy study tracks canine distemper in foxes and badgers

Bottom line

Canine distemper virus is still circulating in wildlife in northern Italy, and new phylogenetic data suggest at least two lineages were involved in Piacenza province between 2021 and June 2026. In the newly published Animals study, investigators working under the Emilia-Romagna Regional Wildlife Monitoring Plan examined 43 wild carnivores and found 12 positives, split evenly between red foxes and European badgers. Complete H-gene sequencing was obtained from four cases, and the authors report co-circulation of the European Wildlife lineage and the Europe/South America-1 lineage, adding to evidence that multiple CDV lineages are established in Italy’s wild carnivore populations. (mdpi.com)

Why it matters: For veterinary professionals, this is another reminder that CDV remains a wildlife-domestic interface problem, not just a shelter or companion animal issue. Earlier work from northern and central Italy has already shown repeated CDV detection in foxes, badgers, wolves, and martens, including outbreaks linked to unusual wildlife mortality and evidence that different lineages can circulate in parallel across regions. That matters for small animal practice, wildlife rehabilitation, and public veterinary services alike: clinicians should keep distemper on the differential for compatible neurologic, respiratory, gastrointestinal, or hyperkeratotic presentations in unvaccinated or under-vaccinated dogs, while surveillance teams should expect wildlife cases to continue surfacing through passive monitoring rather than disappear on their own. (pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)

What to watch: Whether follow-up surveillance shows wider spread beyond Piacenza, additional host species involvement, or further overlap among Italy’s circulating CDV lineages. (mdpi.com)

Key facts

Study location
Piacenza province, northern Italy
Study period
2021 through June 2026
Study design
Wild carnivore surveillance under the Emilia-Romagna Regional Wildlife Monitoring Plan
Sample size
43 wild carnivores tested
Positive samples
12 positives
Species with positives
Six red foxes and six European badgers
Sequencing result
Complete H-gene sequencing from four cases
Lineages detected
European Wildlife and Europe/South America-1
Main finding
At least two canine distemper virus lineages were co-circulating in Piacenza wildlife

A new study in Animals adds fresh evidence that canine distemper virus is persisting in northern Italy’s wildlife and evolving within a multi-host setting. Researchers investigating wild carnivores in Piacenza province from 2021 through June 2026 detected CDV in 12 of 43 animals tested, including six red foxes and six European badgers, and identified two viral lineages through H-gene sequencing: European Wildlife and Europe/South America-1. (mdpi.com)

The findings build on several years of CDV activity in Italy rather than pointing to a one-off event. The new paper follows the first detection of CDV in Piacenza in 2020, while earlier studies from Emilia-Romagna, Lombardy, Sardinia, and southern Italy have documented repeated circulation in foxes, badgers, wolves, martens, and other carnivores. Prior northern Italy surveillance described outbreaks in 2018–2020 and 2021 involving different phylogenetic groups, suggesting that Italy’s wildlife reservoir is supporting long-term maintenance rather than sporadic spillover alone. (mdpi.com)

In the Piacenza study, surveillance was conducted under the Regional Wildlife Monitoring Plan, which is notable in itself: this was structured field surveillance, not just incidental case finding. The authors report that affected animals showed lesions consistent with distemper, including hemorrhagic enteritis, pneumonia with diffuse hepatization, and footpad hyperkeratosis. Genetic characterization was possible for four samples, three from foxes and one from a badger, which allowed the team to place the strains into the European Wildlife and Europe/South America-1 lineages. The paper also notes that continuous genomic surveillance in Europe is confirming active circulation of diverse CDV clades across wild canids and mustelids. (mdpi.com)

That pattern is consistent with what earlier Italian studies have already been warning about. A 2022 report from Emilia-Romagna found a small outbreak centered in Rimini province plus a separate positive fox in Modena, with two different lineages detected in the same region. A 2021 study from Lombardy likewise documented substantial positivity in foxes and badgers and linked the strains to prior epidemic waves in the Alps and northeastern Italy. More recently, investigators in southern Italy reported Arctic-lineage CDV in wildlife collected from 2022 to 2024, reinforcing the idea that multiple lineages are now co-circulating nationally. (pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)

Direct outside commentary on the new Piacenza paper appears limited so far, likely because it was published only days ago. Still, the broader expert and regulatory context is clear. WOAH describes canine morbillivirus as a multi-lineage pathogen affecting canids and felids, and its wildlife surveillance guidance emphasizes the value of structured monitoring in free-ranging species. The new paper fits that framework closely: passive and regional wildlife surveillance is what made these detections possible, and the authors position ongoing monitoring as essential for understanding spread, host range, and risk to other susceptible carnivores. (woah.org)

Why it matters: For practicing veterinarians, the biggest takeaway isn’t just that foxes and badgers were positive. It’s that wildlife surveillance is continuing to show persistent CDV circulation at the domestic-wildlife interface in a country with multiple established lineages. That raises the practical stakes for vaccination compliance, especially in dogs with outdoor exposure, rural contact, rescue histories, or contact with wildlife rehabilitation settings. It also matters for diagnostic reasoning: when dogs present with compatible respiratory, gastrointestinal, neurologic, or dermatologic signs, especially if vaccination status is incomplete, distemper still deserves consideration even in areas where companion animal case counts may seem low. For wildlife and public veterinary services, the study is another argument for integrating pathology, molecular testing, and phylogenetics rather than relying on mortality counts alone. (mdpi.com)

There’s also a conservation angle. Prior Italian and European literature has repeatedly framed CDV as a threat not only to domestic dogs, but also to vulnerable wildlife populations, including wolves and endangered carnivores. The coexistence of several lineages in Italy increases the epidemiologic complexity, and earlier authors have cautioned that wildlife detections may represent only the visible portion of a larger transmission network, especially where subclinical infection goes unnoticed. That makes regional surveillance data relevant beyond Italy, particularly for veterinary systems thinking about wildlife reservoirs, transboundary spread, and the limits of relying on dog-only case detection. (pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)

What to watch: The next signals will be whether additional sequencing expands the lineage picture in Piacenza, whether neighboring provinces or regions report related cases, and whether surveillance begins to detect overlap among European Wildlife, Europe/South America-1, and Arctic-lineage strains in the same ecological corridor. (mdpi.com)

How this developed

  1. The first detection of canine distemper virus in Piacenza was reported.

  2. Wild carnivore surveillance in Piacenza began for the new study.

  3. Surveillance in the study period extended through June 2026.

Common questions

  • Which animals tested positive?
    The study found positives in six red foxes and six European badgers.
  • Which canine distemper virus lineages were found?
    The authors reported the European Wildlife lineage and the Europe/South America-1 lineage.
  • How many animals were tested?
    Researchers tested 43 wild carnivores.
  • What does this mean for pet parents?
    The article says distemper should stay on the differential for unvaccinated or under-vaccinated dogs with compatible respiratory, gastrointestinal, neurologic, or hyperkeratotic signs.

Like what you're reading?

The Feed delivers veterinary news every weekday.